16 Auburn players against 11 St Mick's. Yea...I know...whinge, whinge, moan, groan....wait until we get them all on the park. We wuz robbed...it is the ref's fault....(I am running out of reasons....got any others I can use instead of a real match report?)
Very strange comp the 8s like a lot of them seem to be... I'm from the Winston Hills (the club, not any team in this division... the old legs wouldn't match it with you fellas) and we expected the blacks to do quite well and the whites to really struggle. A few of the lads I know from different clubs have put up St Micks as the team to beat with the Castle Hill teams being there come finals time.
Then I have a look at the results and the blacks are down the bottom, Auburn beat the best team in the comp in St Micks then CHU conceed 4 goals to Stanes who lost 6-1 to Pendo... I just can't figure it out! Must be a tight comp!
I know the whites beat the blacks 1-0 yesterday but that was only because the blacks had 10 players while the whites had 16, and even then the blacks could've easily leveled. If the blacks can get 11 or 12 they could start troubling teams, while the whites will start to drop games at some point... They've just been lucky to date.
A very strange comp indeed it is olebear. GravyStains were very competitive against CHU (who had too many players half interested and turning up late) If it weren't for the keeper, it could have been more. They will defo be up there in August.
CHU 3 -1 Rockets Great game played in good spirits apart from a really fussy ref, Good bunch of lads the Rockets (apart from one - you know who you are - loose cannon). Hope the lad that got a bad knock on his knee is ok.
My mistake i miss-interpretted your post. Your keeper is a gun though. That was a tough game for the ref i dont think either side wanted to play amicably. Dissappointing result for us two late goals but thats football. Hopefully our next encounter can be a bit more tame. Good luck for the rest of the season you are definite contenders.